The impact of FDI on air quality: evidence from China

Berna Kirkulak-Uludag · Wei Yin

83 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Energy, Environment, Economic Growth International Business and FDI Environmental and Air Quality Management

Abstract

Purpose This paper seeks to examine the impact of foreign direct investments (FDI) on air pollution in China using 286 cities from 2001 to 2007. It is a particular interest of this paper to observe the relationship between FDI and air pollution in particular after China joined to World Trade Organization in 2001. This paper provides a better understanding of economic growth and foreign investment while maintaining a sustainable environment. In order to achieve this task, this paper tests whether or not FDI inflow has impact on environmental deterioration in particular on air quality. Design/methodology/approach Since the data are both cross‐sectional and time series, panel data analyses (fixed effects and random effects) were applied. In order to detect the presence of serial correlation of error term, Durbin‐Watson test was used. As serial correlation problem was determined, generalized least square (GLS) using Ar(1) model was used to overcome serial correlation. Findings The findings show that FDI has no negative impact on the air quality in China. Contrary to expectations, the presence of FDI reduces the air pollution. This result can be attributed by the role of FDIs in the economy that FDIs are perceived as main sources of advanced technology in China. One of the striking findings of the paper shows that FDI has no significant impact on air quality in the central and western cities. The reason is that low level of FDI inflows to cities located in the Center and West. The findings are robust under both panel data (fixed effects and random effects) and GLS estimations. Practical implications The results provide a wide array of information useful to practitioners, policy makers. Since the paper shows that FDI has no negative impact on the air quality, this result is crucial in attracting FDI to China. Originality/value This paper provides the largest sample including 286 cities all over China from 2001 to 2007. Considering the distribution of FDI across China, the sample is divided into three regions. Making sub‐samples of the FDI distribution allowed us to examine how the impact of FDI differs on air quality in the East, Central and West regions.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 83 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Economic Growth and the Environment 2019Economic Growth and Income Inequality 1991Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement 1994Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?2004Trade, Growth, and the Environment 2002Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve 2004Trade, Growth, and the Environment 2003Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis

Cited by

2018Effect of FDI on Pollution in China: New Insights Based on Wavelet Approach 2017Does Foreign Direct Investment Successfully Lead to Sustainable Development in Singapore?2018Is financial development in China green? Evidence from city level data 2021The relationship between FDI, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in Asia-Pacific economic cooperation countries 2019Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in Asian countries? A panel data analysis 2020

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.