SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Letters to the editor: time for more scholarly debate
0 references·3 citing·8 second hop
Letters to the editor: time for more scholarly debate (2014)Letters to the editor: time for more scho…La carta al editor en la publicación científica. Consideraciones para su elaboración (2021)La carta al editor en la publ…Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting Letters to the Editor (2016)Enhancing scholarly dialogue:…Write to Me Please: The Scholarly Importance of Letters to the Editor (2015)Write to Me Please: The Schol…Are Editors free from bias? The special case of Letters to the Editor (2006)Writing a letter to the Editor. (2010)The editor's correspondence: Analysis of patterns appearing in selected specialty and general journals (1983)The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals (2009)Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study (2010)La investigación formativa y la formación para la investigación en el pregrado. (2012)What is the role of ‘the letter to the editor’? (2014)Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021La carta al editor en la publicación científica. Consideraciones para su elaboración11 cited
  • 2016Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting Letters to the Editor7 cited
  • 2015Write to Me Please: The Scholarly Importance of Letters to the Editor6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work