Maze learning: Reliability and equivalence of alternate pathways

Stephen C. Bowden

12 citations0/0 files storedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Abstract

The equivalence of a popular Austin Maze path and an alternate mirror reflection was examined in a sample of 44 university students (22 male, 22 female) under a counterbalanced latin square design. While all subjects performed better on the pathway administered second, the two paths were equivalent in difficulty. There was also evidence of a sex difference favouring the males. Correlation coefficients indicated that the Maze displayed alternate-form reliability equal to or better than other popular clinical tests of such learning.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

References

1962Statistical principles in experimental design.1992Statistical Principles in Experimental Design 1985The ninth mental measurements yearbook 1988Cognitive gender differences are disappearing.1978Organic Psychiatry: The Psychological Consequences of Cerebral Disorder 1965Porteus Maze Test: Fifty Years Application 1985Selective reminding test: An examination of the equivalence of four forms 1978Wechsler memory scale: A selective review of the literature

Cited by

1997Confirmatory factor analysis of the wechsler memory scale-revised in a sample of clients with alcohol dependency

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.