SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Need for common internal controls when assessing the relative efficacy of pharmacologic agents using a meta-analytic approach: Case study of cyclooxygenase 2-selective inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis
7 references·0 citing·29 second hop
Need for common internal controls when assessing the relative efficacy of pharmacologic agents using a meta-analytic approach: Case study of cyclooxygenase 2-selective inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis (2005)Need for common internal controls when as…Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (2003)Validity of indirect comparis…Practical Guidelines for Assessing the Clinical Significance of Health-Related Quality of Life Changes within Clinical Trials (2003)Practical Guidelines for Asse…Indirect Comparison in Evaluating Relative Efficacy Illustrated by Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery (2000)Indirect Comparison in Evalua…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Meta-analysis: State-of-the-Science (1992)Meta-analysis: State-of-the-S…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status (1989)Measurement of health status (1989)Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (1994)Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities (2011)Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II – Is all that glitters gold? (2014)The use of the EQ-5D-Y health related quality of life outcome measure in children in the Western Cape, South Africa: psychometric properties, feasibility and usefulness - a longitudinal, analytical study (2017)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)???Lost in Translation??? (2006)Direct versus indirect comparisons: A summary of the evidence (2008)The Effects of Microcredit on Women's Control over Household Spending in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2014)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa (1995)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Sexual Abuse of Boys (1998)Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
  • 1992Meta-analysis: State-of-the-Science499 cited
  • 2003Practical Guidelines for Assessing the Clinical Significance of Health-Related Quality of Life Changes within Clinical Trials242 cited
  • 2000Indirect Comparison in Evaluating Relative Efficacy Illustrated by Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery77 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work