SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Two-thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis
8 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Two-thirds of methodological research remained unpublished after presentation at Cochrane Colloquia: an empirical analysis (2012)Two-thirds of methodological research rem…The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty‐first century (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration: I…Publication rate of abstracts of papers and posters presented at Medical Library Association annual meetings (2010)Publication rate of abstracts…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration (2009)From Mexico to Mali: four yea…Peer Review in Publication: Factors Associated with the Full-Length Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (2008)Peer Review in Publication: F…Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Grey literature in meta-analy…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…METHODOLOGISTS AND THEIR METHODS (2001)METHODOLOGISTS AND THEIR METH…How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions? (2003)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES – WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?Application in practice (2011)Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews (2015)Much at stake: the importance of training and capacity building for stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study (2010)Motivation Interventions in Education (2015)Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation (2017)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Addressing Reporting Biases (2008)Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications (2012)Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? (2014)Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS (2003)Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials (2006)Analysis of Abstracts Presented at the Prosthodontic Research Section of IADR General Sessions 2004–2005: Demographics, Publication Rates, and Factors Contributing to Publication (2011)Fate of abstracts presented at the 2004-2008 International Liver Transplantation Society meetings (2013)Thirty percent of abstracts presented at dental conferences are published in full: a systematic review (2016)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Abstracts Presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: Determinants of Subsequent Peer Reviewed Publication (2006)Enhancing the research and publication efforts of health sciences librarians via an academic writing retreat (2017)Tracing the ‘grey literature’ of poster presentations: a mapping review (2017)An Evidence-Based Approach to Increasing Nurses' Publication Rates (2020)How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. (1997)Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE: developing an objective approach to search strategy design (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2007Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions598 cited
  • 2009From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration83 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty‐first century33 cited
  • 2008Peer Review in Publication: Factors Associated with the Full-Length Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making27 cited
  • 2010Publication rate of abstracts of papers and posters presented at Medical Library Association annual meetings26 cited
  • 2001METHODOLOGISTS AND THEIR METHODS19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work