Revised Guidelines for Urist's Mutuality of Autonomy Scale (MOA)

Margot Holaday · Cheri Lynn Sparks

15 citations0/0 files storedAssessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

Research findings reported in the literature with less than 80% interrater agreement for the Rorschach Mutuality of Autonomy (MOA) scale may be problematic due to possible error. In preparation for a new Rorschach study using the MOA scale, we found it necessary to revise and clarify MOA scale scoring guidelines because they were confusing and ambiguous. A group of 19 naive graduate students improved their interrater agreement scores from 67% using guidelines from the literature, to 75% on the first revision, and these 19 raters plus 13 new raters produced an 80% agreement on a second revision. This revision, with only minor changes based on raters' feedback, is included in an appendix.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 1977The Rorschach Test and the Assessment of Object Relations 1983The Psychological Assessment of Object Representation 1982Validity of the Rorschach Mutuality of Autonomy Scale: A Replication Using Excerpted Responses 1990Projective assessment of object relations: A review of the empirical literature.1990Representation of Interpersonal Interactions on the Rorschach and Level of Psychopathology 1985A Rorschach Assessment of Children's Mutuality of Autonomy 1983Children's Rorschach scores as predictors of later adjustment.

Cited by

2013Does the R-PAS Meet Standards for Forensic Use? Considerations with Introducing a New Rorschach Coding System 2009What Might This Be? Rediscovering the Rorschach as a Tool for Personnel Selection in Organizations 2002How Do I Score Thee? Let Me Count the Ways. Or Some Different Methods of Categorizing Rorschach Responses 2006THE MUTUALITY OF AUTONOMY SCALE: AN IMPLICIT MEASURE OF OBJECT RELATIONS FOR THE RORSCHACH INKBLOT METHOD

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.