SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Evaluation of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK Higher Education
3 references·14 citing·41 second hop
The Evaluation of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK Higher Education (2001)The Evaluation of the Student Evaluation …A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire (1991)A performance indicator of te…SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING (1982)SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND …Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies (1981)Student Ratings of Instructio…Thrown into the fire: Do simulations in an introductory business course increase student engagement? (2025)Thrown into the fire: Do simu…Managing students’ attitude, learning engagement, and stickiness towards e-learning post-COVID-19 in Australian universities: a perceived qualities perspective (2023)Managing students’ attitude, …The Effective Use of Information Technology and Interactive Activities to Improve Learner Engagement (2020)The Effective Use of Informat…Obtaining secondary students’ perceptions of instructional quality: Two-level structure and measurement invariance (2020)Obtaining secondary students’…Student evaluations of teaching: improving teaching quality in higher education (2016)Student evaluations of teachi…Online learning experiences of new versus continuing learners: a large-scale replication study (2016)Online learning experiences o…The Role of Faculty Members' Cross-Cultural Competencies in Their Perceived Teaching Quality: Evidence from Culturally-Diverse Classes in Four European Countries (2012)The Role of Faculty Members' …Student ratings of college teaching: a comparison of faculty and their students (2009)Student ratings of college te…The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching (2008)The differential impact of UK…The introduction of large class problem-based learning into an undergraduate medical curriculum: an evaluation (2005)The introduction of large cla…Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: mode can matter (2005)Online versus traditional tea…Measuring Teachers' Repertoire of Teaching Methods (2002)Measuring Teachers' Repertoir…Electronic Course Surveys: Does automating feedback and reporting give better results? (2002)Electronic Course Surveys: Do…Can Academics Benefit from Training? Some Preliminary Evidence (2000)Can Academics Benefit from Tr…Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential baises, and utility. (1984)Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. (1997)Student ratings: The validity of use. (1997)The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)Understanding Student Learning (1984)Students' evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research (1987)University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice (2002)The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students (2004)Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning (2005)ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* (1976)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2003)The reflection game: enacting the penitent self (2009)Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes (2011)An evaluation framework for identifying the effectiveness and impact of academic teacher development programmes (2015)A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys (2000)Are they the same? Comparing the instructional quality of online and face‐to‐face graduate education courses (2007)Assessing faculty performance using student evaluations of teaching in an uncontrolled setting (2009)Focus Group meets Nominal Group Technique: an effective combination for student evaluation? (2015)Journal of Universal Computer Science (2020)Review of research in education (1973)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems (2003)Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature (2005)On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013)Problem‐based learning: rationale and description (1983)Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning Curricula (2000)Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? (1976)Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys (2003)Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness (2012)Quarterly Review of Distance Education (2002)Student satisfaction with courses and instructors in a flipped classroom: A meta‐analysis (2020)Will artificial intelligence revolutionise the student evaluation of teaching? A big data study of 1.6 million student reviews (2020)Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for National Student Survey: Actionable Insights from Textual Feedback to Enhance Quality of Teaching and Learning in UK’s Higher Education (2022)US-China Education Review A (2025)Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education (1999)Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis (2020)Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness (2007)What Makes Great Teaching? Review of the Underpinning Research. (2014)Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire1,291 cited
  • 1981Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies819 cited
  • 1982SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS' EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING524 cited

Cited by

  • 2008The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching123 cited
  • 2002Electronic Course Surveys: Does automating feedback and reporting give better results?89 cited
  • 2009Student ratings of college teaching: a comparison of faculty and their students82 cited
  • 2016Student evaluations of teaching: improving teaching quality in higher education72 cited
  • 2005Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: mode can matter69 cited
  • 2005The introduction of large class problem-based learning into an undergraduate medical curriculum: an evaluation68 cited
  • 2020The Effective Use of Information Technology and Interactive Activities to Improve Learner Engagement59 cited
  • 2016Online learning experiences of new versus continuing learners: a large-scale replication study56 cited
  • 2000Can Academics Benefit from Training? Some Preliminary Evidence54 cited
  • 2020Obtaining secondary students’ perceptions of instructional quality: Two-level structure and measurement invariance

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

53 cited
  • 2002Measuring Teachers' Repertoire of Teaching Methods53 cited
  • 2012The Role of Faculty Members' Cross-Cultural Competencies in Their Perceived Teaching Quality: Evidence from Culturally-Diverse Classes in Four European Countries38 cited
  • 2023Managing students’ attitude, learning engagement, and stickiness towards e-learning post-COVID-19 in Australian universities: a perceived qualities perspective14 cited
  • 2025Thrown into the fire: Do simulations in an introductory business course increase student engagement?6 cited