Reputational interdependence: an examination of category reputation in higher education

Abstract

This study explores the reputational attributes of three different categories of post-secondary institutions in Canada. Our goal is to contribute to an understanding of the drivers of institutional marketing in higher education by examining category-level reputation. Few researchers have explored the influence and implications of category-level reputation in higher education. Thus, we examine category-level reputation within the context of a study measuring the reputational attributes of three distinct categories of post-secondary institutions (medical-doctoral universities, primarily undergraduate universities, and career colleges) among a single key stakeholder group – employers. We leveraged mixed-methods to analyze the reputational attributes of the three categories. This included one-on-one interviews with employers (N = 30) and a survey of hiring managers (N = 164). The results suggest that among this stakeholder group each category possesses distinct reputational attributes that influence its position in the highly competitive educational marketplace. The implication of category-level reputation in higher education may have a profound influence on stakeholder's formation of beliefs and attitudes towards an institution by anchoring an institution's brand in a category. This anchoring effect may be an asset and offer rewards such as increased prestige; however, it may also act as a liability and risk an institution's position. As a result, category-level reputation may be an important and little understood anchor of an institution's brand and their position in the marketplace.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.