SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Duty to Describe
16 references·7 citing·35 second hop
A Duty to Describe (2014)A Duty to DescribePublication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Publication Manual of the Ame…Growth in a Time of Debt (2010)Growth in a Time of DebtPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Improving the Reporting Quali…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. (1996)Automaticity of social behavi…Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. (1996)Automaticity of social behavi…Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. (1977)Meta-analysis of psychotherap…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-…The psychology of sex differences (1975)The psychology of sex differe…Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (1968)Experimenter Effects in Behav…Tactics of Scientific Research (1960)Tactics of Scientific ResearchSingle paper meta‐analysis is unavoidable (2025)Single paper meta‐analysis is…Open science practices in criminology and criminal justice journals (2024)Open science practices in cri…Reporting quality for abstracts of randomised trials on child and adolescent depression prevention: a meta-epidemiological study on adherence to CONSORT for abstracts (2022)Reporting quality for abstrac…A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories (2022)A meta-analytic approach to e…Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics – A systematic review of literature (2021)Reproducibility and replicabi…Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience (2020)Double trouble? The communica…Mathematical expression and sampling issues of treatment contrasts: Beyond significance testing and meta-analysis to clinically useful research synthesis (2016)Mathematical expression and s…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction (2011)Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. (2011)The New Statistics (2013)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. (1981)Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. (1999)The gender similarities hypothesis. (2005)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)The Aftermath of Financial Crises (2009)From Financial Crash to Debt Crisis (2011)The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1975The psychology of sex differences5,705 cited
  • 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research4,889 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association3,167 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
  • 2010Growth in a Time of Debt2,778 cited
  • 1996Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.2,736 cited
  • 1996Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.2,637 cited
  • 1977Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.2,153 cited
  • 1960Tactics of Scientific Research1,642 cited
  • 1968Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,621 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Reproducibility and replicability crisis: How management compares to psychology and economics – A systematic review of literature58 cited
    • 2020Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience27 cited
    • 2022Reporting quality for abstracts of randomised trials on child and adolescent depression prevention: a meta-epidemiological study on adherence to CONSORT for abstracts13 cited
    • 2024Open science practices in criminology and criminal justice journals12 cited
    • 2022A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories12 cited
    • 2025Single paper meta‐analysis is unavoidable9 cited
    • 2016Mathematical expression and sampling issues of treatment contrasts: Beyond significance testing and meta-analysis to clinically useful research synthesis7 cited