Metaethics and the empirical sciences

Richard Joyce

25 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophical Explorations

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Ethics and Theory Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Abstract

What contribution can the empirical sciences make to metaethics? This paper outlines an argument to a particular metaethical conclusion—that moral judgments are epistemically unjustified—that depends in large part on a posteriori premises.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1907The descent of man and selection in relation to sex 1979Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.1995D arwin's D angerous I dea 2017The Biology of Moral Systems 1992Truth and Objectivity 1996Darwin's dangerous idea 1989Dispositional Theories of Value 1993Essays in Quasi-Realism

Cited by

2015Debunking debunking: a regress challenge for psychological threats to moral judgment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.