Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature

11 references·16 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
2011Reproducible Research in Computational Science1,446 cited
2013Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff1,201 cited
2019Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis335 cited
1992Are all Economic Hypotheses False?297 cited
2002Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?287 cited
1997The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty242 cited
2009Reproducible research and Biostatistics237 cited

Cited by

2019The Prevalence of Marginally Significant Results in Psychology Over Time178 cited
2016Problems in using p -curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p -hacking and evidential value89 cited
2016Distributions of p -values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?89 cited
2015A surge of p -values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

78 cited

2016Is Most Published Research Really False?76 cited

2019The quest for an optimal alpha68 cited

2015Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 201366 cited

2021Reproducible Research: A Retrospective65 cited

2017The Evolution of Data Quality: Understanding the Transdisciplinary Origins of Data Quality Concepts and Approaches57 cited

2018P values in display items are ubiquitous and almost invariably significant: A survey of top science journals53 cited

2017The distribution of P -values in medical research articles suggested selective reporting associated with statistical significance49 cited

2016Optimizing Research Payoff39 cited

2017Type M Error Might Explain Weisburd’s Paradox33 cited

2023NEgatiVE results in Radiomics research (NEVER): A meta-research study of publication bias in leading radiology journals30 cited

2022Emerging Trends: SOTA-Chasing28 cited

2014Publication Bias in Recent Empirical Accounting Research25 cited