How arbitrary is language?
Abstract
It is a long established convention that the relationship between sounds and meanings of words is essentially arbitrary--typically the sound of a word gives no hint of its meaning. However, there are numerous reported instances of systematic sound-meaning mappings in language, and this systematicity has been claimed to be important for early language development. In a large-scale corpus analysis of English, we show that sound-meaning mappings are more systematic than would be expected by chance. Furthermore, this systematicity is more pronounced for words involved in the early stages of language acquisition and reduces in later vocabulary development. We propose that the vocabulary is structured to enable systematicity in early language learning to promote language acquisition, while also incorporating arbitrariness for later language in order to facilitate communicative expressivity and efficiency.
Cite this
Padraic Monaghan B, Richard C. Shillcock, Morten H. Christiansen, Simon Kirby (2014). How arbitrary is language?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
@article{monaghan2014how,
title = {How arbitrary is language?},
author = {B, Padraic Monaghan and Shillcock, Richard C. and Christiansen, Morten H. and Kirby, Simon},
year = {2014},
journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2013.0299}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 318 citations exist upstream.