SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
5 references·11 citing·44 second hop
Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2011)Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research (2005)Quality of Reporting of Obser…Assessing the quality of research (2004)Assessing the quality of rese…A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake (2021)A meta-review demonstrates im…Quality, Equity and Utility of Observational Studies during 10 Years of Implementing the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative in 72 Countries (2020)Quality, Equity and Utility o…Completeness of reporting of case reports in high‐impact medical journals (2020)Completeness of reporting of …Using STROBE checklist to assess the reporting quality of observational studies affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and its correlates: a scientometric study from Iran (2019)Using STROBE checklist to ass…Use of the STROBE Checklist to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Observational Research in Obstetrics (2018)Use of the STROBE Checklist t…Quality of Reporting and Study Design of CKD Cohort Studies Assessing Mortality in the Elderly Before and After STROBE: A Systematic Review (2016)Quality of Reporting and Stud…Evaluation of the Endorsement of the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) Statement on the Reporting Quality of Published Genetic Association Studies (2016)Evaluation of the Endorsement…Cross-sectional studies published in Indian journal of community medicine: Evaluation of adherence to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement (2014)Cross-sectional studies publi…Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to Assess Reporting of Observational Trials in Hand Surgery (2013)Using the Strengthening the R…The quality of reporting in clinical research: the CONSORT and STROBE initiatives (2013)The quality of reporting in c…Reporting Quality of Abstracts Presented at the European Association of Urology Meeting: A Critical Assessment (2012)Reporting Quality of Abstract…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research (2006)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Applying the CONSORT and STROBE Statements to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Studies (2008)Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement (2017)Key performance indicators in hospital based on balanced scorecard model (2017)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Health literacy and vaccination: A systematic review (2017)Mental disorders as risk factors for suicidal behavior in young people: A meta-analysis and systematic review of longitudinal studies (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review (2019)Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19 – a retrospective cross-sectional study (2022)The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)A Meta-Analysis of Evidence Synthesis for a Healthy Campus Built Environment by Adopting Active Design Approaches to Promote Physical Activity (2023)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Reporting quality of case reports about dental trauma published in international journals 2008‐2018 assessed by CARE guidelines (2020)Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: a meta-epidemiologic study (2021)How to Write a Case Report? (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Psychological Distress in Refugee Children: A Systematic Review (2010)The Influence of the Therapist-Patient Relationship on Treatment Outcome in Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic metareview of prediction studies demonstrates stable trends in bias and low PROBAST inter-rater agreement (2023)Towards a Checklist for Improving Action Research Quality in Healthcare Contexts (2023)How do you solve a problem like COREQ? A critique of Tong et al.’s (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)2,774 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement1,987 cited
  • 2004Assessing the quality of research390 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research363 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to Assess Reporting of Observational Trials in Hand Surgery54 cited
  • 2021A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake52 cited
  • 2018Use of the STROBE Checklist to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Observational Research in Obstetrics48 cited
  • 2020Completeness of reporting of case reports in high‐impact medical journals38 cited
  • 2016Quality of Reporting and Study Design of CKD Cohort Studies Assessing Mortality in the Elderly Before and After STROBE: A Systematic Review35 cited
  • 2013The quality of reporting in clinical research: the CONSORT and STROBE initiatives32 cited
  • 2016Evaluation of the Endorsement of the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) Statement on the Reporting Quality of Published Genetic Association Studies23 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Using STROBE checklist to assess the reporting quality of observational studies affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and its correlates: a scientometric study from Iran20 cited
  • 2012Reporting Quality of Abstracts Presented at the European Association of Urology Meeting: A Critical Assessment18 cited
  • 2014Cross-sectional studies published in Indian journal of community medicine: Evaluation of adherence to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement16 cited
  • 2020Quality, Equity and Utility of Observational Studies during 10 Years of Implementing the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative in 72 Countries13 cited