Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The knowledge and use of qualitative description as a qualitative research approach in health services research is limited.The aim of this article is to discuss the potential benefits of a qualitative descriptive approach, to identify its strengths and weaknesses and to provide examples of use. DISCUSSION: Qualitative description is a useful qualitative method in much medical research if you keep the limitations of the approach in mind. It is especially relevant in mixed method research, in questionnaire development and in research projects aiming to gain firsthand knowledge of patients', relatives' or professionals' experiences with a particular topic. Another great advantage of the method is that it is suitable if time or resources are limited. SUMMARY: As a consequence of the growth in qualitative research in the health sciences, researchers sometimes feel obliged to designate their work as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography or a narrative study when in fact it is not. Qualitative description might be a useful alternative approach to consider.
Cite this
Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Frede Olesen, Rikke Sand Andersen, Jens Søndergaard (2009). Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
@article{asbjoern2009qualitative,
title = {Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?},
author = {Neergaard, Mette Asbjoern and Olesen, Frede and Andersen, Rikke Sand and Søndergaard, Jens},
year = {2009},
journal = {BMC Medical Research Methodology},
doi = {10.1186/1471-2288-9-52}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2,077 citations exist upstream.