Article2001

Studying judgement: Some comments and suggestions for future research

18 citations0/0 files storedThinking & Reasoning

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Abstract

Three general issues emerge from the preceding papers: a confusion between judgement and related activities such as decision making, problem solving, and attitudes; differences in the underlying assumptions about the nature of judgement; and different approaches for testing the adequacy of theories human judgement. The implications of these issues for studying human judgement processes and for future research priorities in this area are briefly discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart 1996Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.1984On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge 1997The Logic Of Failure: Recognizing And Avoiding Error In Complex Situations 1970The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making.1975SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY 1979Linear regression and process-tracing models of judgment.1997Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies

Cited by

2001Studying judgement: General issues

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.