Community structure in the phonological network

Cynthia S. Q. Siew

87 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reading and Literacy Development Phonetics and Phonology Research Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Abstract

Community structure, which refers to the presence of densely connected groups within a larger network, is a common feature of several real-world networks from a variety of domains such as the human brain, social networks of hunter-gatherers and business organizations, and the World Wide Web (Porter et al., 2009). Using a community detection technique known as the Louvain optimization method, 17 communities were extracted from the giant component of the phonological network described in Vitevitch (2008). Additional analyses comparing the lexical and phonological characteristics of words in these communities against words in randomly generated communities revealed several novel discoveries. Larger communities tend to consist of short, frequent words of high degree and low age of acquisition ratings, and smaller communities tend to consist of longer, less frequent words of low degree and high age of acquisition ratings. Real communities also contained fewer different phonological segments compared to random communities, although the number of occurrences of phonological segments found in real communities was much higher than that of the same phonological segments in random communities. Interestingly, the observation that relatively few biphones occur very frequently and a large number of biphones occur rarely within communities mirrors the pattern of the overall frequency of words in a language (Zipf, 1935). The present findings have important implications for understanding the dynamics of activation spread among words in the phonological network that are relevant to lexical processing, as well as understanding the mechanisms that underlie language acquisition and the evolution of language.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 87 citations exist upstream.

References

2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal 1998Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model 1991Designing Experiments and Analysing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective.2012Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words 1996Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. 2nd edn. By Jean Aitchison. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994. Pp. xiii, 290.1999Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition 1991Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective.1936The Psycho-Biology of Language. Pp. ix + 336 and 7 plates. By George K. Zipf. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1935.

Cited by

2021Semantic network analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks.2022Brain connectivity–based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure 2018Remotely Close Associations: Openness to Experience and Semantic Memory Structure 2022Semantic memory and creativity: the costs and benefits of semantic memory structure in generating original ideas

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.