Re-Thinking Intersectionality
Abstract
Black feminist and legal studies scholar Jennifer C. Nash asks us to think critically about what has become the discourse and theory most commonly connected to feminism: intersectionality. As Nash puts it, intersectionality is now “the primary analytic tool that feminist and anti-racist scholars deploy for theorizing identity and oppression” (2008, 1). Nash outlines the limits to what she describes as the murky theory of intersectionality, including (1) the lack of a defined intersectional methodology (that is, how we do intersectionality); (2) the use of Black women as quintessential intersectional subjects; and (3) the vague definition of intersectionality. While intersectionality often gets deployed to talk about an individual’s race, class, and gender—which is often reduced to identity—Nash says we need to move beyond such understandings so that we can focus on racism, classism, sexism, and other forms of marginalization as interrelated forms of structural oppression.
Cite this
Jennifer Christine Nash (2008). Re-Thinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
@article{christine2008rethinking,
title = {Re-Thinking Intersectionality},
author = {Nash, Jennifer Christine},
year = {2008},
journal = {Feminist Review},
doi = {10.1057/fr.2008.4}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,995 citations exist upstream.