SHOULD JUDGES CLOSE THE GATE ON PAS AND PA?

Justice R. James Williams

24 citations0/0 files storedFamily Court Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Family and Matrimonial Law Legal processes and jurisprudence Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Abstract

Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation are evolving clinical concepts. They are controversial. Their limits, the limits of the legal system, and recent developments in the use and admissibility of expert evidence call into question the appropriateness of their use within the trial process.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2010Parental Alienation Critics and the Politics of Science 2008The Lingering Debate Over the Parental Alienation Syndrome Phenomenon 2005Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) in the Netherlands 2002An autopoietic approach to 'Parental Alienation Syndrome'2014Exploring the Lived Experiences of Psychologists Working With Parental Alienation Syndrome 2008Confusion and Controversy in Parental Alienation 2006Children Exposed to Domestic Violence: Making Trauma‐Informed Custody and Visitation Decisions

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.