SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
STROBE and reporting observational studies in dermatology
8 references·0 citing·34 second hop
STROBE and reporting observational studies in dermatology (2010)STROBE and reporting observational studie…The Reporting of Observational Research Studies in Dermatology Journals (2010)The Reporting of Observationa…STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)STrengthening the REporting o…CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals (2009)CONSORT adoption and quality …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)How Well Are Randomized Contr…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Better reporting of randomise…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Quality of Reporting and Study Design of CKD Cohort Studies Assessing Mortality in the Elderly Before and After STROBE: A Systematic Review (2016)Use of the STROBE Checklist to Evaluate the Reporting Quality of Observational Research in Obstetrics (2018)A Review of Statistical Reporting in Dietetics Research (2010–2019): How is a Canadian Journal Doing? (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial (2000)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Sample Size Calculation in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Reporting, Characteristics, and Results in Randomized Controlled Trials (2011)Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study (2017)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials (2002)Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials (2008)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Association of functional variants in the dopamine D2-like receptors with risk for gambling behaviour in healthy Caucasian subjects (2010)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)STROBE, CONSORT, PRISMA, MOOSE, STARD, SPIRIT, and other guidelines – Overview and application (2024)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
  • 2009STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement344 cited
  • 2000How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?126 cited
  • 2009CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals77 cited
  • 2010The Reporting of Observational Research Studies in Dermatology Journals60 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work