SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Review of quality assessment tools for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiological safety studies (2012)Review of quality assessment tools for th…Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study (2011)Uses and misuses of the STROB…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Critical evaluation of the Ne…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Task Force on Community Preventive Services (2005)Task Force on Community Preve…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Physical risk factors for neck pain (2000)Physical risk factors for nec…Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org (2000)Data collection instrument an…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…Critical appraisal of the health research literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem. (1998)Critical appraisal of the hea…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Workplace ergonomic factors and the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limbs: A meta‐analysis (1991)Workplace ergonomic factors a…How well can we assess the validity of non-randomised studies of medications? A systematic review of assessment tools (2021)How well can we assess the va…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review (2013)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events (2008)Travel and the Built Environment (2010)Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. (2017)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2010Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses17,378 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies2,698 cited
  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2005Task Force on Community Preventive Services1,159 cited
  • 1998Critical appraisal of the health research literature: prevalence or incidence of a health problem.549 cited
  • 2000Physical risk factors for neck pain524 cited
  • 2000

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org
464 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 1991Workplace ergonomic factors and the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limbs: A meta‐analysis319 cited
  • 2011Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study287 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021How well can we assess the validity of non-randomised studies of medications? A systematic review of assessment tools19 cited