Jurors' Assessment of Criminal Responsibility

Rita M. James

20 citations0/0 files storedSocial Problems

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Criminal Law and Policy Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Abstract

deal with jurors' reactions to alternative legal criteria of responsibility in a sequence of experimental cases involving a plea of insanity. The present discussion will be limited to comments and impressions relevant to jurors' assessment of responsibility in the first of these jury experiments. The problem as we have approached it may be divided into three sections: the legal and historical background, the research design, and the data.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

1956Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations 1957Social Status in Jury Deliberations 1958The Jury, The Law and the Personal Injury Damage Award

Cited by

1999"Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy": Erratum.1990De facto departures from insanity instructions: Toward the remaking of common law.1987The mental illness defense in the capital penalty hearing

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.