SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses from China in the Genomic Era
8 references·16 citing·52 second hop
The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses from China in the Genomic Era (2013)The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses f…A Framework To Facilitate the Use of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Design of Primary Research Studies (2012)A Framework To Facilitate the…Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? (2009)Randomized trials published i…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature (2005)Local Literature Bias in Gene…Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Direction and impact of langu…Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials (1998)Do Certain Countries Produce …Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified? (1998)Can quality of clinical trial…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…More science friction for less science fiction (2025)More science friction for les…Factors associated with successful publication for systematic review protocol registration: an analysis of 397 registered protocols (2023)Factors associated with succe…High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)High variability in results a…COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment (2021)COVID-19 meta-analyses: a sco…Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language (2021)Clinical Epidemiology in Chin…Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology (2020)Redundant meta-analyses are c…An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence (2019)An observational study found …Systematic review and meta-analysis in GI endoscopy: Why do we need them? How can we read them? Should we trust them? (2018)Systematic review and meta-an…Meta-analyses in environmental and occupational health (2018)Meta-analyses in environmenta…Massive citations to misleading methods and research tools: Matthew effect, quotation error and citation copying (2018)Massive citations to misleadi…Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability? (2018)Epidemiology of systematic re…Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China (2017)Retracted publications in the…Triangulating meta-analyses: the example of the serotonin transporter gene, stressful life events and major depression (2016)Triangulating meta-analyses: …What is the future of biomedical research? (2015)What is the future of biomedi…Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses (2015)Reporting and methodological …Channeling the flood of meta-analyses (2015)Channeling the flood of meta-…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessment (2007)Meta‐Analysis Methods (2008)Comparative effect sizes in randomised trials from less developed and more developed countries: meta-epidemiological assessment (2013)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions (2012)The quality of evidence in Chinese meta-analyses needs to be improved (2016)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. (2017)Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey (2022)Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes (2022)Characteristics of retracted publications related to pain research: a systematic review (2023)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research study (2021)How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: a practical guide (2023)Tool to assess risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of mental health disorders (RoB-PrevMH) (2023)The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials (2013)Teaching Non-target Information to Children with Disabilities: An Examination of Instructive Feedback Literature (2018)Modeling Digital Business Ecosystems: A Systematic Literature Review (2022)Employer Drug Benefit Plans and Spending on Prescription Drugs (2002)The psychology of obesity: An umbrella review and evidence-based map of the psychological correlates of heavier body weight (2020)Psychopathy and dangerousness: An umbrella review and meta-analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
  • 1998Do Certain Countries Produce Only Positive Results? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials684 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences497 cited
  • 2009Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?231 cited
  • 2005Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature169 cited
  • 1998Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?75 cited
  • 2012A Framework To Facilitate the Use of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Design of Primary Research Studies74 cited

Cited by

  • 2019An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence56 cited
  • 2017Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China48 cited
  • 2015Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses43 cited
  • 2018Massive citations to misleading methods and research tools: Matthew effect, quotation error and citation copying28 cited
  • 2021High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2015What is the future of biomedical research?22 cited
  • 2016Triangulating meta-analyses: the example of the serotonin transporter gene, stressful life events and major depression21 cited
  • 2018Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability?19 cited
  • 2021Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language17 cited
  • 2018Systematic review and meta-analysis in GI endoscopy: Why do we need them? How can we read them? Should we trust them?15 cited
  • 2020Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology14 cited
  • 2018Meta-analyses in environmental and occupational health11 cited
  • 2025More science friction for less science fiction10 cited
  • 2023Factors associated with successful publication for systematic review protocol registration: an analysis of 397 registered protocols10 cited
  • 2021COVID-19 meta-analyses: a scoping review and quality assessment10 cited
  • 2015Channeling the flood of meta-analyses10 cited