Articlegreen2008

The Mental Health of US Adolescents Adopted in Infancy

Margaret A. Keyes · Anu Rani Sharma · Irene J. Elkins · William G. Iacono · Matt K. McGue

175 citations0/0 files storedArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Child Welfare and Adoption Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adopted adolescents are at excess risk for clinically relevant behavioral and emotional problems. DESIGN: We examined whether adopted and nonadopted adolescents differed on quantitative indicators of mental health and the prevalence of childhood disorders and whether differences exist between internationally and domestically placed adoptees. SETTING: Assessments occurred at the University of Minnesota from December 11, 1998, to June 4, 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Adolescents adopted in infancy were systematically ascertained from records of 3 large Minnesota adoption agencies; nonadopted adolescents were ascertained from Minnesota birth records. The final sample included these adolescents with their rearing parents. Main Exposure The main exposure was adoptive status: nonadopted (n = 540), international adoptive placement (n = 514), or domestic adoptive placement (n = 178). OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) clinical assessments based on child and parent reports of attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional defiant, conduct, major depressive, and separation anxiety disorders; teacher reports of psychological health; and contact with mental health professionals. RESULTS: Adoptees scored only moderately higher than nonadoptees on quantitative measures of mental health. Nevertheless, being adopted approximately doubled the odds of having contact with a mental health professional (odds ratio [OR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-2.84) and of having a disruptive behavior disorder (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.72-3.19). Relative to international adoptees, domestic adoptees had higher odds of having an externalizing disorder (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.67-4.04). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate mean differences in quantitative indicators of mental health can lead to substantial differences in disorder prevalence. Although most adopted adolescents are psychologically healthy, they may be at elevated risk for some externalizing disorders, especially among those domestically placed.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 175 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication 1982Best Estimate of Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnosis 1967A CHILDREN'S BEHAVIOUR QUESTIONNAIRE FOR COMPLETION BY TEACHERS: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 2000Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA)2005Behavior Problems and Mental Health Referrals of International Adoptees 1987Reliability, validity, and Parent-Child Agreement Studies of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA)200510-Year Research Update Review: The Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Disorders: II. Developmental Epidemiology 2006Do the Effects of Early Severe Deprivation on Cognition Persist Into Early Adolescence? Findings From the English and Romanian Adoptees Study

Cited by

2008An Adoption Study of Parental Depression as an Environmental Liability for Adolescent Depression and Childhood Disruptive Disorders 2010Behavioral and emotional symptoms of post‐institutionalized children in middle childhood 2008The Effect of Family Communication Patterns on Adopted Adolescent Adjustment 2011II. DEVELOPMENT OF ADOPTED CHILDREN WITH HISTORIES OF EARLY ADVERSITY

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.