SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Access and the Humanities
0 references·16 citing·56 second hop
Open Access and the Humanities (2014)Open Access and the HumanitiesEvaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study (2024)Evaluation of Large Language …Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers (2023)Toward equitable open researc…The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges (2023)The oligopoly’s shift to open…The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)The APC-barrier and its effec…The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing (2022)The oligopoly’s shift to open…Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Dynamics of cumulative advant…Scaling Small; Or How to Envision New Relationalities for Knowledge Production (2021)Scaling Small; Or How to Envi…Open Access in Theory and Practice (2020)Open Access in Theory and Pra…How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)How is open access accused of…Revisiting “the 1990s debutante”: Scholar‐led publishing and the prehistory of the open access movement (2019)Revisiting “the 1990s debutan…Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities? (2019)Open Science in the Humanitie…Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research (2019)Digital Technology and the Pr…Academic publishing and open access: Costs, benefits and options for publishing research (2019)Academic publishing and open …Science and the politics of openness (2018)Science and the politics of o…The moral economy of open access (2017)The moral economy of open acc…Making Open Access work (2015)Making Open Access workAcademic tribes and territories (1989)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals (2017)Ciencia abierta: un modelo con piezas por encajar (2021)THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY (1971)The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. (1971)The Great Transformation (2002)With or without U? Assemblage theory and (de)territorialising the university (2018)A Maussian bargain: Accumulation by gift in the digital economy (2020)A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship (2020)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)How Professors Think (2009)The Democratisation Myth (2021)Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach (1981)Analytic Autoethnography (2006)Bibliografia sobre preservação digital: um levantamento nos diversos suportes informacionais (2021)From Handwriting to Footprinting (2023)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)Diffusion of innovations (2003)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries (2022)The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2024)Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1959)Applications of case study research (1993)Handbook of Qualitative Research. (1995)How Are Biology Concepts Used and Transformed? (2020)Is It Possible to Scientifically Reconstruct the History of Life on Earth? (2020)Philosophy of Science for Biologists (2020)The emergence of China as a leading nation in science (2005)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies (2024)Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Science (2025)The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology (2024)Evaluating the linguistic coverage of OpenAlex : An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness (2025)The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Could AI help you to write your next paper? (2022)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Estimating the use of ChatGPT in dental research publications (2024)Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)Influence of Topic Familiarity and Prompt Specificity on Citation Fabrication in Mental Health Research Using Large Language Models: Experimental Study (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2022Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review142 cited
  • 2020How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing128 cited
  • 2023The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges120 cited
  • 2015Making Open Access work79 cited
  • 2024Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study74 cited
  • 2023The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing67 cited
  • 2019Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research59 cited
  • 2019Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities?55 cited
  • 2018Science and the politics of openness43 cited
  • 2017The moral economy of open access42 cited
  • 2023Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers39 cited
  • 2021Scaling Small; Or How to Envision New Relationalities for Knowledge Production38 cited
  • 2022The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing34 cited
  • 2020Open Access in Theory and Practice

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited
  • 2019Revisiting “the 1990s debutante”: Scholar‐led publishing and the prehistory of the open access movement30 cited
  • 2019Academic publishing and open access: Costs, benefits and options for publishing research29 cited