SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests: The STARD Initiative 10 Years On
8 references·2 citing·41 second hop
Reporting the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests: The STARD Initiative 10 Years On (2013)Reporting the Accuracy of Diagnostic Test…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…STARD Statement: Still Room for Improvement in the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2008)STARD Statement: Still Room f…Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT St…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors (2007)Endorsement of the STARD Stat…Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (2005)Reporting Recommendations for…Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Sources of Variation and Bias…Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Towards complete and accurate…Adherence to Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Medicine Research (2017)Adherence to Standards for Re…Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate? (2016)Is There an Association betwe…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review (2008)Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies for fine‐ and core needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions in otolaryngology journals: A systematic review and analysis (2013)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (2005)REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2006)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review (2013)STROBE, CONSORT, PRISMA, MOOSE, STARD, SPIRIT, and other guidelines – Overview and application (2024)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Does the Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, as Defined by STARD 2015, Affect Citation? (2016)Are Study and Journal Characteristics Reliable Indicators of “Truth” in Imaging Research? (2017)Selective Citation Practices in Imaging Research: Are Diagnostic Accuracy Studies With Positive Titles and Conclusions Cited More Often? (2019)Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)Defining and Measuring Meditation-Related Adverse Effects in Mindfulness-Based Programs (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2,148 cited
  • 2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.862 cited
  • 2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy800 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
  • 2008STARD Statement: Still Room for Improvement in the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies36 cited
  • 2007Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors34 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Is There an Association between STARD Statement Adherence and Citation Rate?19 cited
  • 2017Adherence to Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Medicine Research19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work