SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Searching for Indirect Evidence and Extending the Network of Studies for Network Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Venous Thromboembolic Events Prevention Following Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery
15 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Searching for Indirect Evidence and Extending the Network of Studies for Network Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Venous Thromboembolic Events Prevention Following Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery (2014)Searching for Indirect Evidence and Exten…Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta‐analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons (2013)Visualizing the flow of evide…Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making in Healthcare (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…How Valuable are Multiple Treatment Comparison Methods in Evidence-Based Health-Care Evaluation? (2011)How Valuable are Multiple Tre…Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2 (2011)Conducting Indirect-Treatment…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Network Meta-Analysis with Competing Risk Outcomes (2010)Network Meta-Analysis with Co…Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency (2010)Mixed treatment comparison an…No Study Left Behind: A Network Meta-Analysis in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Demonstrating the Importance of Considering All Relevant Data (2009)No Study Left Behind: A Netwo…How Far Do You Go? Efficient Searching for Indirect Evidence (2009)How Far Do You Go? Efficient …Mixed treatment comparison with multiple outcomes reported inconsistently across trials: Evaluation of antivirals for treatment of influenza A and B (2008)Mixed treatment comparison wi…Meta‐analysis of mixed treatment comparisons at multiple follow‐up times (2007)Meta‐analysis of mixed treatm…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Approximate cross‐validatory predictive checks in disease mapping models (2003)Approximate cross‐validatory …Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)A primer on network meta-analysis with emphasis on mental health (2015)Psychological interventions for resilience enhancement in adults (2017)Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The evolution of a new publication type: Steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews (2010)Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks (2014)Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review (2013)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 7 (2013)Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments (2024)Spatial Correlation in Ecological Analysis (1993)On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions (1995)Bayesian Detection of Clusters and Discontinuities in Disease Maps (2000)Bayesian latent variable modelling of multivariate spatio-temporal variation in cancer mortality (2007)Using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations for the Evaluation of Veterinary Surveillance Data from Switzerland: A Case-Study (2010)Methods to assess evidence consistency in dose‐response model based network meta‐analysis (2021)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014)Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis (2015)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1 (2013)Extrapolating Survival from Randomized Trials Using External Data: A Review of Methods (2016)Performing Arm-Based Network Meta-Analysis in R with the pcnetmeta Package (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2012Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 21,206 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2011Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2770 cited
  • 2012Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making in Healthcare217 cited
  • 2013Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta‐analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons206 cited
  • 2003Approximate cross‐validatory predictive checks in disease mapping models143 cited
  • 2010Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency135 cited
  • 2007Meta‐analysis of mixed treatment comparisons at multiple follow‐up times117 cited
  • 2011How Valuable are Multiple Treatment Comparison Methods in Evidence-Based Health-Care Evaluation?90 cited
  • 2010Network Meta-Analysis with Competing Risk Outcomes86 cited
  • 2008Mixed treatment comparison with multiple outcomes reported inconsistently across trials: Evaluation of antivirals for treatment of influenza A and B60 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009
No Study Left Behind: A Network Meta-Analysis in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Demonstrating the Importance of Considering All Relevant Data
41 cited
  • 2009How Far Do You Go? Efficient Searching for Indirect Evidence35 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.