SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to write consistently boring scientific literature
0 references·16 citing·55 second hop
How to write consistently boring scientific literature (2007)How to write consistently boring scientif…Can ChatGPT be used to predict citation counts, readership, and social media interaction? An exploration among 2222 scientific abstracts (2024)Can ChatGPT be used to predic…Writing mathematical ecology: A guide for authors and readers (2021)Writing mathematical ecology:…Why Should Scientists be on YouTube? It’s all About Bamboo, Oil and Ice Cream (2021)Why Should Scientists be on Y…Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific papers (2021)Specialized terminology reduc…Better Writing in Scientific Publications Builds Reader Confidence and Understanding (2021)Better Writing in Scientific …On Deepest Caves, Extreme Habitats, and Ecological Superlatives (2020)On Deepest Caves, Extreme Hab…How can we boost the impact of publications? Try better writing (2019)How can we boost the impact o…Uniting science and stories: Perspectives on the value of storytelling for communicating science (2018)Uniting science and stories: …The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Introduction (2018)The Principles of Biomedical …Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them (2017)Record breaking achievements …What should not be in a manuscript submitted to a scientific journal (2015)What should not be in a manus…Scientists can be free, but only once they are tenured (2015)Scientists can be free, but o…Cómo escribir un artículo. Cuestiones formales (2013)Cómo escribir un artículo. Cu…How to get your paper accepted for publication (2011)How to get your paper accepte…Injecting youth into peer-review to increase its sustainability: a case study of ecology journals (2010)Injecting youth into peer-rev…Adding Spice to Our Scholarly Journals: The JIBS Experience (2010)Adding Spice to Our Scholarly…Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published (2005)The tragedy of the reviewer commons* (2008)The Golden Rule of Reviewing (2009)Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals (2012)Reviewer overload and what can we do about it (2014)Double-blind peer review of manuscripts: opportunities, challenges, and way forward (2020)Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation (2003)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Common Fallacies in Designing a Research Project: Guidance Principles (2019)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: How to Choose a Journal? (2020)Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)Systema naturae per regna tria naturae : secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (1767)Prevalence, co-morbidity and correlates of mental disorders in the general population: results from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey (GHS) (2004)Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders (2006)Drivers of species knowledge across the tree of life (2023)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. (2000)Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences (2014)A Good Story Well Told: Storytelling Components That Impact Science Video Popularity on YouTube (2020)Improving productivity in Hollywood with data science: Using emotional arcs of movies to drive product and service innovation in entertainment industries (2020)Ten simple rules for scientists engaging in science communication (2023)Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (1996)Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines (2002)Aspects of article introductions (2011)The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Materials and Methods (2019)The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results (2019)The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Citation (2020)Stylish Academic Writing (2011)How to solve the world's biggest problems (2015)The sense of style: the thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century! (2015)Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations (2020)Measuring the influence of non-scientific features on citations (2022)Philosophical Investigations. (1954)Tractatus logico-philosophicus (2021)Availability of web servers significantly boosts citations rates of bioinformatics methods for protein function and disorder prediction (2023)Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation (2023)Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (2023)Structural Equation Modeling (2003)How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing (2007)The ODD protocol: A review and first update (2010)Writing statistical methods for ecologists (2023)Six personas to adopt when framing theoretical research questions in biology (2024)Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? (2004)A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science (2013)Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015)Adjectives and adverbs in life sciences across 50 years: implications for emotions and readability in academic texts (2022)Words as Gatekeepers: Measuring Discipline-specific Terms and Meanings in Scholarly Publications (2023)Cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement with science news predicted by the use of accessibility strategies in science-minded and general audiences (2024)The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors (1966)An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. (2009)Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers (2016)The use of ChatGPT for identifying disruptive papers in science: a first exploration (2024)Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of large language models: advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects – An opinion paper (2025)The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research: a review of author guidelines in leading journals across eight social science disciplines (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them66 cited
  • 2018Uniting science and stories: Perspectives on the value of storytelling for communicating science60 cited
  • 2021Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific papers60 cited
  • 2019How can we boost the impact of publications? Try better writing59 cited
  • 2018The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Introduction36 cited
  • 2021Better Writing in Scientific Publications Builds Reader Confidence and Understanding36 cited
  • 2024Can ChatGPT be used to predict citation counts, readership, and social media interaction? An exploration among 2222 scientific abstracts34 cited
  • 2010Injecting youth into peer-review to increase its sustainability: a case study of ecology journals21 cited
  • 2011How to get your paper accepted for publication18 cited
  • 2021Writing mathematical ecology: A guide for authors and readers18 cited
  • 2020On Deepest Caves, Extreme Habitats, and Ecological Superlatives17 cited
  • 2021Why Should Scientists be on YouTube? It’s all About Bamboo, Oil and Ice Cream14 cited
  • 2010Adding Spice to Our Scholarly Journals: The JIBS Experience9 cited
  • 2015What should not be in a manuscript submitted to a scientific journal

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited
  • 2015Scientists can be free, but only once they are tenured7 cited
  • 2013Cómo escribir un artículo. Cuestiones formales6 cited