References

• 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
• 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
• 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
• 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
• 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
• 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
• 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
• 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
• 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
• 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
• 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
• 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
• 2009When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings852 cited
• 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
• 1999