SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publish or Perish, and Pay—The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals
4 references·11 citing·44 second hop
Publish or Perish, and Pay—The New Paradigm of Open-Access Journals (2014)Publish or Perish, and Pay—The New Paradi…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Anatomy of open access publis…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Access to evidence-based care: a systematic review of trauma and surgical literature costs across resource settings (2024)Access to evidence-based care…Preventing fraud in biomedical research (2022)Preventing fraud in biomedica…Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma (2021)Philosophers' perceptions of …Open access journals are as likely to be referenced by the Orthopaedic literature, despite having a lower impact factor than subscription-based journals (2021)Open access journals are as l…Open access journals are as likely to be referenced by the Orthopaedic literature, despite having a lower impact factor than subscription-based journals (2021)Open access journals are as l…Visibility and growth of LIS research publications: a Scopus based analysis of select open access journals during 2001 to 2015 (2019)Visibility and growth of LIS …Predatory publishing: A wake-up call for editors and authors in the Middle East and Africa (2017)Predatory publishing: A wake-…Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation (2016)Quality Assessment of Studies…Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals (2016)Medical publishing and the th…Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Access Journals (2015)Submission Bias and the Rise …Collaborative publishing: the difference between ‘gratis journals’ and ‘open access journals’ (2015)Collaborative publishing: the…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Open Access (2012)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Effects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: a comparison between subscription-based and full Open Access models (2019)The effect of “open access” on journal impact factors: A causal analysis of medical journals (2019)The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada (2016)Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals (2016)Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry (2017)Predatory journals exploit structural weaknesses in scholarly publishing (2018)Burden and Characteristics of Unsolicited Emails from Medical/Scientific Journals, Conferences, and Webinars to Faculty and Trainees at an Academic Pathology Department (2019)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Authors’ Selection of Target Journals and Their Attitudes to Emerging Journals: A survey from two developing regions (2019)Charity starts at home: Emerging Journals should receive “positive discrimination” by their regional academia (2021)How are academic libraries in Spanish-speaking Latin America responding to new models of scholarly communication and predatory publishing? (2021)Do open‐access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? A bibliometric study of selected open‐access journals using Google Scholar (2008)Positioning Open Access Journals in a LIS Journal Ranking (2012)A Bibliometric Study of Scholarly Articles Published by Library and Information Science Authors about Open Access. (2014)Gauging the research performance of BRICS in the domain of Library and Information Science through Performance analysis and Science mapping (2023)A decadal study on identifying latent topics and research trends in open access LIS journals using topic modeling approach (2024)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Open Access and the Humanities (2014)A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis (2022)Philosophers’ appraisals of bibliometric indicators and their use in evaluation: from recognition to knee-jerk rejection (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publications From 1975 to 2024: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends, Reasons, and Countries Using the Retraction Watch Database (2025)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 2012Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure364 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation41 cited
  • 2016Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals28 cited
  • 2017Predatory publishing: A wake-up call for editors and authors in the Middle East and Africa17 cited
  • 2019Visibility and growth of LIS research publications: a Scopus based analysis of select open access journals during 2001 to 201516 cited
  • 2022Preventing fraud in biomedical research15 cited
  • 2021Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma14 cited
  • 2021Open access journals are as likely to be referenced by the Orthopaedic literature, despite having a lower impact factor than subscription-based journals14 cited
  • 2021Open access journals are as likely to be referenced by the Orthopaedic literature, despite having a lower impact factor than subscription-based journals13 cited
  • 2015Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Access Journals11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015Collaborative publishing: the difference between ‘gratis journals’ and ‘open access journals’9 cited
  • 2024Access to evidence-based care: a systematic review of trauma and surgical literature costs across resource settings8 cited