SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis
6 references·13 citing·45 second hop
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis (2006)Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal R…Negative Results and Impact Factor (2005)Negative Results and Impact F…Cochrane neonatal systematic reviews: a survey of the evidence for neonatal therapies (2003)Cochrane neonatal systematic …THE TYPICAL COCHRANE REVIEW (2002)THE TYPICAL COCHRANE REVIEWPublication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Publication and related bias …Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Evidence certainty in neonatology—a meta-epidemiological analysis of Cochrane reviews (2025)Evidence certainty in neonato…Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study (2022)Conclusiveness, linguistic ch…Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions (2020)Should low-quality evidence d…Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review (2019)Conclusiveness of Cochrane Re…High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (2017)High quality of evidence is u…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer (2015)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews (2015)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared for the Era of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research? (2013)Is The Cochrane Collaboration…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Nutrition: a systematic analysis (2013)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: past and future (2013)Cochrane systematic reviews i…Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology (2012)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: What's there and what should be (2010)Cochrane systematic reviews i…Trends in neonatology and pediatrics publications over the past 12 years (2007)Trends in neonatology and ped…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis (2013)Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals (2016)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis (2006)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (1998)A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)Evidence‐based therapy in neonatology: distilling the evidence and applying it in practice* (2004)Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal (2013)Completeness of main outcomes across randomized trials in entire discipline: survey of chronic lung disease outcomes in preterm infants (2015)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Systematic Reviews for the Mental Health Field: Is the Gold Standard Tarnished? (2013)Towards a methodology for literature reviews in social sciences (2014)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses (2013)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Why most published meta-analysis findings are false (2019)Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery (2021)Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Unknown Prevalence of Postrandomization Bias in 15 Physical Therapy Journals: A Methods Review (2021)Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews (2022)Assessing the Sensitivity of Meta-analysis to Selection Bias: A Multiple Imputation Approach (2010)Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews (2010)Interventions to support autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs in organizations: A systematic review with recommendations for research and practice (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2000Publication and related bias in meta-analysis2,283 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2005Negative Results and Impact Factor85 cited
  • 2002THE TYPICAL COCHRANE REVIEW54 cited
  • 2003Cochrane neonatal systematic reviews: a survey of the evidence for neonatal therapies46 cited

Cited by

  • 2010Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: What's there and what should be26 cited
  • 2020Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions26 cited
  • 2017High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine23 cited
  • 2013Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Nutrition: a systematic analysis19 cited
  • 2013Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared for the Era of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research?19 cited
  • 2015Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews16 cited
  • 2025Evidence certainty in neonatology—a meta-epidemiological analysis of Cochrane reviews14 cited
  • 2019Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2015Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer13 cited
  • 2022Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study12 cited
  • 2012Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology12 cited
  • 2007Trends in neonatology and pediatrics publications over the past 12 years11 cited
  • 2013Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: past and future9 cited