Psychology and Neuroscience

Gregory A. Miller · Jennifer Keller

77 citations0/0 files storedCurrent Directions in Psychological Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and Theoretical Science Philosophy and History of Science Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Abstract

There has been no historically stable consensus about the relationship between psychological and biological concepts and data. A naively reductionist view of this relationship is prevalent in psychology, medicine, and basic and clinical neuroscience. This view undermines the ability of psychology and related sciences to achieve their individual and combined potential. A nondualistic, nonreductionist, noninteractive perspective is recommended, with psychological and biological concepts both having central, distinct roles.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 77 citations exist upstream.

References

1947Of mental health.1999Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model.2007Psychological Explanation 1992Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: Doctrine of multilevel analysis.1995The Behavioral High-Risk Paradigm in Psychopathology 1999Making the case for psychophysiology during the era of molecular biology

Cited by

2024The psychometric upgrade psychophysiology needs 2016Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC 2022Possible in Psychology 2016Award for distinguished contributions to psychophysiology: Gregory A. Miller

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.