Honorary authorship in postgraduate medical training

Sathish Rajasekaran · Alto S. Lo · Abdel-Rahman Aly · Nigel L. Ashworth

15 citations0/0 files storedPostgraduate Medical Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic Writing and Publishing Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether postgraduate medical trainees are exposed to honorary authorship, whether they are aware of the topic and if they believe that further support and education concerning this issue is needed. METHODS: Postgraduate medical trainees were contacted by email with a link to our questionnaire on two occasions (2 and 26 February 2014) and then contacted in person (June-November 2014). The questionnaire topics included demographics, authorship practice beliefs and experience, and authorship policy-related questions. We also determined the proportion of perceived, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)-defined and unperceived honorary authorship in the respondent group. RESULTS: The response rate was 27.7%. The prevalence of perceived, ICMJE-defined and unperceived honorary authorship was 38.1%, 57.3% and 24.2%, respectively; 90.1% were unaware of the ICMJE authorship criteria, 92.6% were unaware of a support system for authorship disputes, but 91.8% believed such a system should be implemented and 93.3% believed medical trainees and faculty should be instructed on authorship guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: A paradigm shift from the current system is needed, where enforcement of ethical authorship practices is shifted away from journal editors. Instruction on the topic should be provided to medical trainees throughout medical school and continued during further training. A process should also be outlined to resolve authorship disputes. These measures may encourage researchers to have an open discussion on the topic prior to the commencement of a research project, and to resolve authorship conflicts in a constructive manner. We also hope this paper encourages further work on the topic.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals 2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey 1990International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.1994The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers 2002Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews 1996Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship.1987The integrity of the scientific literature 1983Lessons from the Darsee Affair

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.