Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance

7 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998Measuring Second Language Performance1,253 cited
1996The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance1,147 cited
1977Japanese Patterns of Behavior686 cited
1998THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF TIME FOR PLANNING ON SECOND LANGUAGE PERFORMANCE514 cited
1999PLANNING AND FOCUS ON FORM IN L2 ORAL PERFORMANCE450 cited
1989Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation265 cited
1992The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews152 cited

Cited by

2008Peer–Peer Interaction between L2 Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Their Interactions and Reflections145 cited
2018To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom135 cited
2010Spoken fluency revisited129 cited
2009The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment115 cited
2014Young Foreign Language Learners’ Interactions During Task-Based Paired Assessments114 cited
2006Validity evidence in a university group oral test111 cited
2021Foundational Principles ofTask-Based Language Teaching104 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010

Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher- and lower-scoring students

94 cited

2002Interpretations, intended uses and designs in task-based language assessment84 cited

2015Motivation for participation or non-participation in group tasks: A dynamic systems model of task-situated willingness to communicate82 cited

201610. A focus on mode81 cited

2021Learners’ Engagement in L2 Computer‐Mediated Interaction: Chat Mode, Interlocutor Familiarity, and Text Quality81 cited

2006A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion76 cited

2014Coming to terms with innovative high-stakes assessment practice: Teachers’ viewpoints on assessment reform75 cited

2020Human versus Computer Partner in the Paired Oral Discussion Test71 cited

2011Effects of test-taker characteristics and the number of participants in group oral tests71 cited