SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Internet-based symptom questionnaire that is reliable, valid, and available to psychiatrists, neurologists, and psychologists.
5 references·0 citing·24 second hop
An Internet-based symptom questionnaire that is reliable, valid, and available to psychiatrists, neurologists, and psychologists. (2007)An Internet-based symptom questionnaire t…The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the Gold Standard Become a Lead Weight? (2004)The Hamilton Depression Ratin…Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences (2000)Optimal number of response ca…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales: A …Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. (1960)Rating scales, discriminabili…On the Loss of Reliability in Ratings Due to Coarseness of the Scale. (1924)On the Loss of Reliability in…The Graphic Rating Scale. (1923)The will-temperament and its testing (1923)The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement (1991)Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales (1997)Risk assessment of halal products and services: Implication for tourism industry (2017)The Relation between Information and Variance Analyses (1956)The category effect in social judgment: Experimental ratings of happiness. (1988)Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact (2008)Content validity is naught (2009)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale—Revised (CESD-R): Pragmatic depression assessment in the general population (2010)A review of depression and suicide risk assessment using speech analysis (2015)Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential (2015)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. (1980)A power primer. (1992)Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales (2008)Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)Refining the theory of basic individual values. (2012)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use9,594 cited
  • 2000Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences2,104 cited
  • 2004The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the Gold Standard Become a Lead Weight?1,148 cited
  • 1924On the Loss of Reliability in Ratings Due to Coarseness of the Scale.197 cited
  • 1960Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission.116 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work