Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does

8 references·16 citing·49 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1998Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness1,331 cited
2005Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women496 cited
2003Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?404 cited
2010The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces318 cited
2001Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide.225 cited
1996Facial Dominance of West Point Cadets as a Predictor of Later Military Rank224 cited
2004Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces204 cited
2007Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces179 cited

Cited by

2014Attitudes to Income Inequality148 cited
2014Cross-Cultural Agreement in Facial Attractiveness Preferences: The Role of Ethnicity and Gender120 cited
2019Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions113 cited
2011Experimental evidence that women's mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity100 cited
2010Further evidence for regional variation in women's masculinity preferences87 cited
2016Mate preferences and choices for facial and body hair in heterosexual women and homosexual men: influence of sex, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

87 cited

2015Variation in Women’s Preferences Regarding Male Facial Masculinity Is Better Explained by Genetic Differences Than by Previously Identified Context-Dependent Effects71 cited

2012Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies68 cited

2017Aggressor or protector? Experiences and perceptions of violence predict preferences for masculinity66 cited

2014The Status-Size Hypothesis: How Cues of Physical Size and Social Status Influence Each Other62 cited

2016Beards and the big city: displays of masculinity may be amplified under crowded conditions59 cited

2014The Influence of the Digital Divide on Face Preferences in El Salvador: People without Internet Access Prefer More Feminine Men, More Masculine Women, and Women with Higher Adiposity58 cited

2012Homeliness is in the disgust sensitivity of the beholder: relatively unattractive faces appear especially unattractive to individuals higher in pathogen disgust57 cited

2013Cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the male face54 cited

2013Illness in childhood predicts face preferences in adulthood49 cited

2017Do prevailing environmental factors influence human preferences for facial morphology?49 cited