Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What Has a Decade of Daubert Wrought?

2 references·8 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2001Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.252 cited
2002Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials.86 cited

Cited by

2006Toxic Torts: Science, Law, and the Possibility of Justice53 cited
2005Scientific Evidence and Public Policy32 cited
2011A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE27 cited
2005The Perils of Relying on Interested Parties to Evaluate Scientific Quality27 cited
2005A Daubert Motion: A Legal Strategy to Exclude Essential Scientific Evidence in Toxic Tort Litigation26 cited
2007The Effects of Ideology on Federal Trial Judges' Decisions to Admit Scientific Expert Testimony19 cited
2008Response to Russell's (2007) and Hom's (2008) Commentary on “A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology”4 cited
2025Forensics: Methodological Challenges and Empirical Evidence2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work