SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey: Table 1
8 references·16 citing·42 second hop
Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey: Table 1 (2007)Scientific misconduct from the perspectiv…The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire—Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and Psychometric Testing (2005)The Scientific Misconduct Que…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyAuthors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials (2005)Authors' reports about resear…A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud (2001)A survey of newly appointed c…Fraud in Medical Research (2000)Fraud in Medical ResearchPreventing scientific misconduct. (1998)Preventing scientific miscond…Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Fraud and Misconduct in Medic…Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Ethical Problems in Academic …Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review (2023)Misconduct in biomedical rese…Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA (2020)Assessing the perceived preva…Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos? (2019)Research integrity: environme…Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians (2018)Researcher Requests for Inapp…Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior (2018)Associations between attitude…In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities (2017)In Their Own Words: Research …A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East (2017)A Cross-Sectional Survey Stud…Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers (2016)Are Leadership and Management…Scientific Dishonesty (2015)Scientific DishonestyScientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science? (2014)Scientific Misconduct: Also a…Establishing good collaborative research practices in the responsible conduct of research in nursing science (2014)Establishing good collaborati…Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent (2013)Research Misconduct—Definitio…Scientific dishonesty—questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden (2010)Scientific dishonesty—questio…Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey (2010)Ethical concerns of nursing r…Research Coordinators' Experiences With Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity (2009)Research Coordinators' Experi…Value Dissonance and Ethics Failure in Academia: A Causal Connection? (2008)Value Dissonance and Ethics F…The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)Toward a theory of organizational socialization (1977)Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors (2010)Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Measurement in nursing research (1984)Journal of Clinical Psychology (2006)Ethics Instruction Increases Graduate Students' Responsible Conduct of Research Knowledge but not Moral Reasoning (2009)Survey Research Methods. (1985)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct (2009)Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts of Interest, and Research Misconduct (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth-Telling (2012)Underreporting research is scientific misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions (2019)Ideal and actual roles of university professors in academic integrity management: a comparative study (2020)Has Mendel's work been rediscovered? (1936)Newton and the Fudge Factor (1973)A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics (1992)Research Misconduct (2003)Factors Associated with Research Wrongdoing in Nigeria (2012)Social Structure and Anomie (1938)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Social Structure and Anomie (2017)Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research (2020)Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers (2021)Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain (2021)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship (2020)Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors' perspectives (2020)Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (2020)Messaging in Biological Psychiatry: Misrepresentations, Their Causes, and Potential Consequences (2020)Research Integrity and Misconduct in the Academic Profession (2013)Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors (2015)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud (1995)Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries (1999)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 1993Ethical Problems in Academic Research246 cited
  • 1996Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research99 cited
  • 2000Fraud in Medical Research97 cited
  • 1998Preventing scientific misconduct.89 cited
  • 2005Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials69 cited
  • 2001A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud63 cited
  • 2005The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire—Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and Psychometric Testing59 cited

Cited by

  • 2017A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East56 cited
  • 2018Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians54 cited
  • 2009Research Coordinators' Experiences With Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity46 cited
  • 2020Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA42 cited
  • 2008Value Dissonance and Ethics Failure in Academia: A Causal Connection?41 cited
  • 2019Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos?40 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Scientific Dishonesty
37 cited
  • 2013Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent36 cited
  • 2010Scientific dishonesty—questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden35 cited
  • 2016Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers34 cited
  • 2018Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior28 cited
  • 2010Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey28 cited
  • 2023Misconduct in biomedical research: A meta-analysis and systematic review27 cited
  • 2014Scientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science?26 cited
  • 2017In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities25 cited
  • 2014Establishing good collaborative research practices in the responsible conduct of research in nursing science22 cited