SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals
3 references·16 citing·56 second hop
Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals (2014)Core Journals in Library and Information …Analysis of a Decade in Library Literature: 1994–2004 (2007)Analysis of a Decade in Libra…The Perception of Library and Information Science Journals by LIS Education Deans and ARL Library Directors: A Replication of the Kohl–Davis Study (2005)The Perception of Library and…Ranking of Journals in Library and Information Science: A Comparison of Perceptual and Citation-Based Measures (1991)Ranking of Journals in Librar…What are you reading? From core journals to trendy journals in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field (2023)What are you reading? From co…Unwrap citation count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals (2020)Unwrap citation count, Altmet…Knowledge structure transition in library and information science: topic modeling and visualization (2020)Knowledge structure transitio…Foucault's toolbox: use of Foucault's writings in LIS journal literature, 1990–2016 (2020)Foucault's toolbox: use of Fo…Academic libraries as the flagships of publishing trends in LIS: a complex analysis of rankings, citations and topics of research (2020)Academic libraries as the fla…Popular research topics in the recent journal publications of library and information science (2019)Popular research topics in th…Examination of correlates of H-index as a measure of research productivity for library and information science faculty in the United States and Canada (2019)Examination of correlates of …Bibliometric research (2018)Bibliometric researchGiving Credit: How Well Do Librarians Cite and Quote Their Sources? (2017)Giving Credit: How Well Do Li…Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact? (2017)Do subjective journal ratings…Comparison of US and UK rankings of LIS journals (2017)Comparison of US and UK ranki…The challenges facing library and information science journals: Editors' opinions (2016)The challenges facing library…(Non-)use of Foucault’sArchaeology of KnowledgeandOrder of Thingsin LIS journal literature, 1990-2015 (2016)(Non-)use of Foucault’sArchae…The decision to submit to a journal: Another example of a valence‐consistent Shift? (2015)The decision to submit to a j…Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007–2012 (2015)Disciplinary, national, and d…LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study (2014)LIS journals categorization i…Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 (1998)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Examining interdisciplinarity of library and information science (LIS) based on LIS articles contributed by non-LIS authors (2018)Editorial team scholarly index (ETSI): an alternative indicator for evaluating academic journal reputation (2019)The Public Librarian (1952)Marketing Journal Hierarchies: Faculty Perceptions, 1986-87 (1987)The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs* (1994)The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies (2007)Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: a case study of the library and information science field (2010)International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level (2013)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Determining Sample Size for Research Activities (1970)Research methods for the behavioral sciences (2016)Exploring the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science (LIS) from the perspective of interdisciplinary LIS authors (2018)One category, two communities: subfield differences in “Information Science and Library Science” in Journal Citation Reports (2019)Cross-disciplinary collaboration versus coexistence in LIS serials: analysis of authorship affiliations in four European countries (2020)Discipline impact factors: A method for determining core journal lists (1978)Characteristics of a Literature as Predictors of Relatedness Between Cited and Citing Works (1982)Journal citation measures: a concise review (1988)A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: the case of the Journal of Information Science (2003)Practitioners and academics as authors and readers: the case of LIS journals (2008)‘Empirical characteristics’ of scholarly journals in hospitality and tourism research: An assessment (2009)Library and Information Science Research: An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature. (1987)Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science. (1990)Analyzing the Library Periodical Literature: Content and Authorship (1991)Highly cited articles in library and information science: An analysis of content and authorship trends (2010)Key words and their role in information retrieval (2010)Research status and characteristics of library and information science in Taiwan: a bibliometric analysis (2012)The peer‐review process (2002)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: a comparison between Web of Science and Scopus (2012)Percepción de las revistas científicas españolas hacia el acceso abierto, open peer review y altmetrics (2017)A decadal study on identifying latent topics and research trends in open access LIS journals using topic modeling approach (2024)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Citation analytics: Data exploration and comparative analyses of CiteScores of Open Access and Subscription-Based publications indexed in Scopus (2014–2016) (2018)Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions (2019)Funding as a determinant of Citation Impact in Scientific Papers in different countries (2023)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (2010)The dynamics of research subfields for library and information science: an investigation based on word bibliographic coupling (2020)Intellectual structure of information science 2011–2020: an author co-citation analysis (2021)Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science—Leading to fragmentation? (2022)Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure (1981)Studying the history of ideas using topic models (2008)Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2018)Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory (2022)Largest contribution to LIS by external disciplines as measured by the characteristics of research articles (2022)Progress and Knowledge Transfer from Science to Technology in the Research Frontier of CRISPR Based on the LDA Model (2022)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Does technology adoption matter for SMEs? A literature review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005The Perception of Library and Information Science Journals by LIS Education Deans and ARL Library Directors: A Replication of the Kohl–Davis Study105 cited
  • 1991Ranking of Journals in Library and Information Science: A Comparison of Perceptual and Citation-Based Measures63 cited
  • 2007Analysis of a Decade in Library Literature: 1994–200461 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007–201247 cited
  • 2020Knowledge structure transition in library and information science: topic modeling and visualization44 cited
  • 2019Popular research topics in the recent journal publications of library and information science37 cited
  • 2018Bibliometric research35 cited
  • 2017Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?33 cited
  • 2014LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study32 cited
  • 2016The challenges facing library and information science journals: Editors' opinions17 cited
  • 2020Academic libraries as the flagships of publishing trends in LIS: a complex analysis of rankings, citations and topics of research16 cited
  • 2015The decision to submit to a journal: Another example of a valence‐consistent Shift?15 cited
  • 2019Examination of correlates of H-index as a measure of research productivity for library and information science faculty in the United States and Canada

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

13 cited
  • 2023What are you reading? From core journals to trendy journals in the Library and Information Science (LIS) field12 cited
  • 2016(Non-)use of Foucault’sArchaeology of KnowledgeandOrder of Thingsin LIS journal literature, 1990-201511 cited
  • 2020Unwrap citation count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals11 cited
  • 2017Comparison of US and UK rankings of LIS journals10 cited
  • 2020Foucault's toolbox: use of Foucault's writings in LIS journal literature, 1990–20169 cited
  • 2017Giving Credit: How Well Do Librarians Cite and Quote Their Sources?3 cited