A Citation Analysis of Sub-Saharan African Library and Information Science Journals using Google Scholar

Abstract

In bibliomnetrics, the numbers of research articles and citations constitute the main measurement indicators of research output and impact respectively. This study evaluates the library and information scietnce/studies (LIS) journals published in sub-Saharan Aji-ican countries in order to assess their periformnance. Drawing its data from Google Scholar; the paper compares the performnance of' 13 LIS journals using the following indicators: number of publications; average number of records; number qf citations; citations per year; citations per article; citedness and uncitedness of the records published in each journal; h-index and g-index; and citation mnpact factor The paper also identifies journals With the most cited works and ranks the journals according to the above measurement indicators. Results indicate that publication of LIS journals in Sub-Saharan Africa is a relatively recent practice; a number of journals have not published any issues for close to 5 years; some journals have ceased publication; there is irregular publication of journals; there are about five core LIS journals in the region; AJLAIS was the most highly cited journal, but the most in?fluential journals in ternis of the IF include SAJLIS, Innovation and Mousaion. The

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.