Article2012

Approaching Religiosity/Spirituality and Health from the Eudaimonic Perspective

17 citations0/0 files storedSocial and Personality Psychology Compass

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Workplace Spirituality and Leadership

Abstract

Abstract Religiosity/spirituality (RS) has been linked to positive health outcomes across a large number of studies, with these effects seen most strongly among disadvantaged groups such as minorities, women, and those of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Given that disadvantaged groups typically have worse health outcomes and not better, it is not clear why the effects of RS are stronger for disadvantaged groups. A key difficulty in understanding the relationship between RS and health lies in the theoretical perspectives used in research. Health and well‐being is typically assessed from the hedonic perspective which emphasizes pleasure and happiness as important outcomes and assumes that difficult life situations contribute to negative health. The eudaimonic perspective, on the other hand, emphasizes meaning and relationships, and assumes that difficult life situations can contribute to increased meaning in life and stronger relationships. The eudaimonic perspective provides a better framework for understanding why RS leads to better health for disadvantaged groups for three reasons. First, having meaning in life and strong relationships are related to positive health outcomes and buffer the negative effects of stress. Second, in addition to being more religious, disadvantaged groups report lower hedonic well‐being and report higher eudaimonic well‐being. Third, low SES religious individuals have better than expected health outcomes and low SES materialistic individuals have worse than expected health outcomes. Overall, the eudaimonic perspective better accounts for the research findings in RS and health and provides a strong foundation for future research in this area.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of DSM-III-R Psychiatric Disorders in the United States 2001On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being 1999Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology 2004TARGET ARTICLE: "Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence"2004High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success 2006Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being 1999Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model.1996The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health.

Cited by

2020Meaning in Life as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Intrinsic Religiosity and Depression Symptoms

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.