Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements

Abstract

A firm’s actions in one market can change competitors’ strategies in a second market by affecting its own marginal costs in that other mar-ket. Whether the action provides costs or benefits in the second market depends on (a) whether it increases or decreases marginal costs in the second market and (b) whether competitors’ products are strategic substitutes or strategic complements. The latter distinction is determined by whether more “aggressive” play (e.g., lower price or higher quantity) by one firm in a market lowers or raises compet-ing firms’ marginal profitabilities in that market. Many recent results in oligopoly theory can be most easily understood in terms of strategic substitutes and complements.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2,526 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.