SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A comparison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation
16 references·2 citing·34 second hop
A comparison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation (2005)A comparison of alternative certainty cal…Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods (2008)Chapter 81 Experimental Evide…Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: Th…Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and internet surveys : t…Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty (2003)Analysis of contingent valuat…What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? (2001)What Experimental Protocol In…Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys (1999)Yea-Saying in Contingent Valu…Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach (1998)Elicitation Effects in Contin…Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods (1997)Using Donation Mechanisms to …Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model (1997)Treatment of “Don't-Know” Res…Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good? (1996)Which Response Format Reveals…Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research (1996)Answering Questions: Methodol…Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation (1995)Discrete Choice under Prefere…Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation (1995)Bias in Discrete Response Con…Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies (1991)Confidence Intervals for Eval…On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities (1986)On Approximating the Statisti…Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses (1984)Welfare Evaluations in Contin…Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures? (2016)Choice certainty in Discrete …Who Pays More for a Cultural Festival, Tourists or Locals? A Certainty Analysis of a Contingent Valuation Application (2011)Who Pays More for a Cultural …Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1982)Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer (2002)Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling (2003)Contingent Valuation in Practice (2017)Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? (1979)Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? (1994)Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐to‐Pay for Golden Rice (2003)Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks (2004)Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon (2006)The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance (2017)Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation (1991)Report of NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation (1993)Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias (2001)Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2007)Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment (1972)Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence (1989)Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation (2005)WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES? (2011)Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics (1983)Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method (1989)Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis (2018)Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias (2019)Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. (2004)The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? (2008)Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin? (2001)Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application (2019)E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review (2006)Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review (2009)Methodological studies of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the US national comorbidity survey (NCS) (1998)Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality 1 (2000)The Science of Asking Questions (2003)Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation (1994)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method9,606 cited
  • 2007Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method3,220 cited
  • 1984Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses2,818 cited
  • 1986On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities2,382 cited
  • 2001What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?1,003 cited
  • 1996Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research691 cited
  • 1997Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods583 cited
  • 1998Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach394 cited
  • 1996Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?368 cited
  • 1991Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies345 cited
  • 1995Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation310 cited
  • 1995Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation308 cited
  • 1999Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys269 cited
  • 2003Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

240 cited
  • 1997Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model240 cited
  • 2008Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods236 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures?66 cited
    • 2011Who Pays More for a Cultural Festival, Tourists or Locals? A Certainty Analysis of a Contingent Valuation Application63 cited