SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
14 references·1 citing·34 second hop
The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation (2010)The premiss-based approach to judgment ag…Abstract Arrowian aggregation (2010)Abstract Arrowian aggregationAggregation of binary evaluations (2008)Aggregation of binary evaluat…Strategy-proof judgement aggregation (2007)Strategy-proof judgement aggr…Judgment aggregation without full rationality (2007)Judgment aggregation without …Arrow's Theorem in Judgement Aggregation (2007)Arrow's Theorem in Judgement …A generalised model of judgment aggregation (2006)A generalised model of judgme…Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems (2005)Judgment aggregation: (im)pos…Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result (2002)Aggregating Sets of Judgments…Probability Logic for Type Spaces (2001)Probability Logic for Type Sp…Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma (2001)Deliberative Democracy and th…The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts (1993)The One and the Many: Adjudic…Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine (1992)Modeling Collegial Courts. II…Unpacking the Court (1986)Unpacking the CourtArrow's theorem, many agents, and invisible dictators (1972)Arrow's theorem, many agents,…Complexity of Judgment Aggregation (2012)Complexity of Judgment Aggreg…Taking Rights Seriously (1978)Law's Empire (1986)Groups with minds of their own (2001)A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions (2004)Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1 (2004)Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules (2007)The Calculus of Consent (1960)The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason (2006)Justice and the Politics of Difference (2012)The theory of communicative action (2014)Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice (2015)Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model (1967)Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, Part III. The Basic Probability Distribution of the Game (1968)Chapter 43 Incomplete information (2002)Cognitive Foundations of Probability (2002)Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III: Part I. The Basic Model (2004)Epistemic Game Theory (2014)Social Choice and Individual Values. (1951)Social Choice and Individual Values (1952)Utility Theory for Decision Making (1971)Chapter 22 Social choice theory (1986)Social Choice and the Mathematics of Manipulation (2005)On The Robustness of Majority Rule (2008)Democratic Answers to Complex Questions – An Epistemic Perspective (2006)Judgment aggregation: a survey (2009)The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review (2011)Collective Choice and Social Welfare (1972)The Law of Group Polarization (2002)Joint Actions and Group Agents (2006)Handbook of Computational Social Choice (2016)Impartial division of a dollar (2007)Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution (1989)Responsibility Incorporated (2007)On the people's terms: a republican theory and model of democracy (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result620 cited
  • 2001Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma348 cited
  • 1986Unpacking the Court337 cited
  • 1993The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts324 cited
  • 2007Arrow's Theorem in Judgement Aggregation260 cited
  • 1972Arrow's theorem, many agents, and invisible dictators246 cited
  • 2008Aggregation of binary evaluations167 cited
  • 1992Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine157 cited
  • 2001Probability Logic for Type Spaces152 cited
  • 2005Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems147 cited
  • 2006A generalised model of judgment aggregation138 cited
  • 2007Strategy-proof judgement aggregation117 cited
  • 2010Abstract Arrowian aggregation107 cited
  • 2007Judgment aggregation without full rationality100 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Complexity of Judgment Aggregation84 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work