Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quantitative methods in syntax/semantics research: A response to Sprouse and Almeida (2013)

12 references·5 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994The earth is round (p < .05).3,999 cited
2000Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality357 cited
2010The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research297 cited
2008The Gradience of the Dative Alternation277 cited
2004Intuitions in linguistic argumentation268 cited
2007Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot243 cited
2010Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research230 cited
2013The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics226 cited
2011Using Mechanical Turk to Obtain and Analyze English Acceptability Judgments207 cited
1978Asking More Than One Thing at a Time176 cited
2006Amnestying Superiority Violations: Processing Multiple Questions124 cited
1968Indirect object constructions in English and the ordering of transformations. By Charles J. Fillmore. (Monographs on linguistic analysis, 1.) Pp. 54. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.103 cited

Cited by

2018The reliability of acceptability judgments across languages59 cited
2014How to investigate linguistic diversity: Lessons from the Pacific Northwest57 cited
2014The "Unreliability" of Epistemic Intuitions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

55 cited

2016SNAP Judgments: A Small n Acceptability Paradigm (SNAP) for Linguistic Acceptability Judgments50 cited

2020Assessing introspective linguistic judgments quantitatively: the case of The Syntax of Chinese32 cited