Meta-analysis of Comparative Therapy Outcome Studies: a Reply to Wilson

David A. Shapiro · Diana Shapiro

29 citations0/0 files storedBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Wilson's recent critique of the authors' appraisal of meta-analysis appears to misunderstand them as claiming more for meta-analysis than they intended. The present paper seeks to clarify consequent confusions concerning selection of studies, the quality of the literature reviewed, the classification of therapies, and the non-identical results of different meta-analyses. It is acknowledged that no single meta-analysis is definitive.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

1980The benefits of psychotherapy 1982Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: A replication and refinement.1982Psychotherapy outcome: Smith and Glass' conclusions stand up under scrutiny.1981Does Psychotherapy Benefit Neurotic Patients?1983Comparative therapy outcome research: Methodological implications of meta-analysis.1982Meta-analysis of Comparative Therapy Outcome Research: a Critical Appraisal

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.