'Natural' and 'contrived' data: a sustainable distinction?Susan A. Speer2002-08-01articleDiscourse Studies232 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 232 citations exist upstream.References1968Studies in Ethnomethodology.1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation1995Lectures on Conversation1973Opening up Closings1987Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour1985Structures of Social Action1992Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in ConversationCited by2019Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis2005Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities2016Utilizing big data analytics for information systems research: challenges, promises and guidelines2017What is ethnography? Can it survive? Should it?2012Subjectivity in psychological science: From problem to prospect.2011Introduction: Interviews vs. ‘natural’ contexts: A false dilemma2005New racism, meritocracy and individualism: constraining affirmative action in education2008All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics 1