SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting of Systematic Reviews: The Challenge of Genetic Association Studies
9 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Reporting of Systematic Reviews: The Challenge of Genetic Association Studies (2007)Reporting of Systematic Reviews: The Chal…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland (2007)Why Most Published Research F…Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessment (2007)Selection in Reported Epidemi…Many Reviews Are Systematic but Some Are More Transparent and Completely Reported than Others (2007)Many Reviews Are Systematic b…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Bias in Clinical Intervention…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…WHO's Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative (HINARI) (2002)WHO's Health InterNetwork Acc…Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research (1999)Clinical Epidemiological Qual…journal impact factors (1998)journal impact factorsImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings (2009)Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update (2013)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Some main problems eroding the credibility and relevance of randomized trials. (2008)A Central Theory of Biology (2015)Biases and imperatives in handling medical technology (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good (1995)Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA): An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Efficacy of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2014)Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution (2007)A bibliometric investigation of life cycle assessment research in the web of science databases (2014)The Social Media Index: Measuring the Impact of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Websites (2015)Biomedical Journals and Global Poverty: Is HINARI a Step Backwards? (2007)Are open access article processing charges affordable for otolaryngologists in low-income and middle-income countries? (2023)Evaluating the evidence: the methodological and reporting quality of comparative observational studies of surgical interventions in urological publications (2008)Systematic Reviews for Informing Rehabilitation Practice: An Introduction (2012)A Statistical Method for Synthesizing Meta-Analyses (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2006Bias in Clinical Intervention Research636 cited
  • 1999Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research175 cited
  • 1998journal impact factors151 cited
  • 2007Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessment115 cited
  • 2007Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author's Reply to Goodman and Greenland110 cited
  • 2007Many Reviews Are Systematic but Some Are More Transparent and Completely Reported than Others34 cited
  • 2002WHO's Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative (HINARI)32 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work