SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Controversy over “Contradiction”: Should Randomized Trials Always Trump Observational Studies?
4 references·0 citing·22 second hop
Controversy over “Contradiction”: Should Randomized Trials Always Trump Observational Studies? (2009)Controversy over “Contradiction”: Should …Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature (2007)Persistence of Contradicted C…How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals? (2006)How Evidence-Based Are Public…Assessing the quality of research (2004)Assessing the quality of rese…Defining the State of Knowledge with Respect to Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer (2003)Defining the State of Knowled…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research (2005)A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research (2006)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Level of Evidence in Four Selected Rehabilitation Journals (2011)Level of evidence in hand surgery (2012)Trends in the Level of Evidence in Clinical Hand Surgery Research (2016)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Reproducibility of systematic literature reviews on food, nutrition, physical activity and endometrial cancer (2007)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians) (2008)A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation (2014)Learning From Testimony on Quantitative Research in Management (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Assessing the quality of research390 cited
  • 2007Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature227 cited
  • 2006How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals?35 cited
  • 2003Defining the State of Knowledge with Respect to Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work