Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Estimating the percentage of the population with abnormally low scores (or abnormally large score differences) on standardized neuropsychological test batteries: A generic method with applications.

8 references·16 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary6,120 cited
2018Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children4,109 cited
2004Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed.1,934 cited
2000Essentials of WISC-IV Assessment473 cited
2005Testing for Suspected Impairments and Dissociations in Single-Case Studies in Neuropsychology: Evaluation of Alternatives Using Monte Carlo Simulations and Revised Tests for Dissociations.407 cited
1996An empirical approach to determining criteria for abnormality in test batteries with multiple measures.234 cited
2018A Handbook of Neuropsychological Assessment172 cited
2003Clinical Neuropsychology151 cited

Cited by

2014False-Positive Rates Associated with the Use of Multiple Performance and Symptom Validity Tests187 cited
2009Developments in neuropsychological assessment: Refining psychometric and clinical interpretive methods.108 cited
2010Advanced Clinical Interpretation of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: Prevalence of Low Scores Varies by Level of Intelligence and Years of Education97 cited
2013False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests94 cited
2014Examination of Performance Validity Test Failure in Relation to Number of Tests Administered92 cited
2008An index‐based short form of the WAIS‐III with accompanying analysis of reliability and abnormality of differences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

90 cited

2009Comparing Actual to Estimated Base Rates of "Abnormal" Scores on Neuropsychological Test Batteries: Implications for Interpretation75 cited

2009An index‐based short‐form of the WISC‐IV with accompanying analysis of the reliability and abnormality of differences72 cited

2014Validation of an integrated method for determining cognitive ability: Implications for routine assessments and clinical trials71 cited

2015Advanced Administration and Interpretation of Multiple Validity Tests68 cited

2023Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical Practice62 cited

2010Healthy Children Get Low Scores Too: Prevalence of Low Scores on the NEPSY-II in Preschoolers, Children, and Adolescents61 cited

2009Advanced Interpretation of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery with Older Adults: Base Rate Analyses, Discrepancy Scores, and Interpreting Change54 cited

2010Improving Accuracy for Identifying Cognitive Impairment53 cited

2010Psychometric Foundations for the Interpretation of Neuropsychological Test Results50 cited

2009Healthy children and adolescents obtain some low scores across a battery of memory tests50 cited