SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is “insufficient evidence”?
8 references·5 citing·45 second hop
What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is “insufficient evidence”? (2004)What is the point of databases of reviews…The Kappa Statistic: A Second Look (2004)The Kappa Statistic: A Second…Quality of Cochrane reviews (2002)Quality of Cochrane reviewsThe Cochrane Collaboration (2001)The Cochrane CollaborationQuality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 (2001)Quality of Cochrane reviews: …How Can Hand Searching the Dermatological Literature Benefit People With Skin Problems? (2001)How Can Hand Searching the De…The Cochrane Skin Group (1998)The Cochrane Skin GroupMethodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus (2015)Bibliometric characteristics …Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible? (2014)Empleo de las revisiones sist…The Cochrane Skin Group: a vanguard for developing and promoting evidence‐based dermatology (2013)The Cochrane Skin Group: a va…The Increasing Importance of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Dermatology Research and Publication (2006)The Increasing Importance of …The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence (2005)The Cochrane Skin Group: Prom…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)How prominent are patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of dermatological treatments? (2008)Strengths and limitations of evidence-based dermatology (2014)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)The Journal of Investigative Dermatology (1967)Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology (2012)Uso de Pesquisa Bibliográfica em Informática na Educacão: um Mapeamento Sistemático (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review (2020)Systematic Reviews: Characteristics and Impact (2020)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Inequalities between multi-rater kappas (2010)Automatic detection of rumor on Sina Weibo (2012)Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey (2016)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. (2005)High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews (2005)Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (2003)Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR (2018)Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting (2019)Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2005)The Impact of Evidence-Based Medicine on Qualitative Metasynthesis: Benefits to be Harvested and Warnings to be Given (2018)Recommendations for enhancing the usability and understandability of process mining in healthcare (2020)Mental illness and help-seeking behaviours among Middle Eastern cultures: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2004The Kappa Statistic: A Second Look488 cited
  • 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998159 cited
  • 2001The Cochrane Collaboration74 cited
  • 2002Quality of Cochrane reviews59 cited
  • 1998The Cochrane Skin Group35 cited
  • 2001How Can Hand Searching the Dermatological Literature Benefit People With Skin Problems?25 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus21 cited
  • 2006The Increasing Importance of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Dermatology Research and Publication19 cited
  • 2005The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence11 cited
  • 2014Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible?10 cited
  • 2013The Cochrane Skin Group: a vanguard for developing and promoting evidence‐based dermatology7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work